Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) The following parameters of voice quality will be rated upon completion of the following tasks. Request PDF on ResearchGate | On Jan 1, , M. Behlau and others published Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was developed to provide a protocol and form for clinicians to use when assessing the voice.
|Published (Last):||26 January 2008|
|PDF File Size:||7.76 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.32 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Assessment practices of Irish speech and language therapists in the evaluation of voice disorders. Development of a standardized clinical protocol. Voice Disorders Search for additional papers on this topic.
Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice, voice assessment, validity, rater reliability. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners’ judgments of dysphonic voice.
Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Rating action. Accepted papers become the permanent property of Auditory and Vestibular Research. A summary of the consensus conference proceedings and the factors considered by the authors in developing this instrument are included. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. Topics Discussed in This Paper.
Does the presence or location of graphic markers affect untrained listeners’ ratings of severity of dysphonia? The CAPE-V protocol and recording form were designed to promote a standardized approach to evaluating and documenting auditory-perceptual judgments of vocal quality. For reliability purposes, the voice samples of 40 dysphonic neurogenic, functional with and without laryngeal lesions adults years of age and 10 normal healthy speakers were recorded.
References Publications referenced by this paper. Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission.
Construct voife concurrent validity were performed with Student t test and multiserial correlation coefficient, respectively. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
Measurement theory in action: The qualitative content validity was proved for developed Persian version of the consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice.
Intrarater reliability was obtained audigory-perceptual Pearson correlation. Eddins Journal of voice: This study examined the reliability and the empirical validity of the CAPE-V when used by experienced voice clinicians judging normal and disordered voices. Development of a standardized clinical protocol ‘ American Journal of Speech-Language Pathologyvol. Perceptual and acoustic analysis of voice in individuals with total thyroidectomy: Kreiman J, Gerratt BR.
Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Get Access Get Access. Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality.
The CAPE-V form and instructions, included as appendices to this article, enable clinicians to document perceived voice quality deviations following a standard i. Content validity was auditory-lerceptual by an EP linguistic expert. Developing auditory-perceptual judgment reliability in otolaryngology residents. Development of a standardized clinical protocol Gail B. Masoud Motasaddi Zarandy Associate Editor: Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer.
Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice. StefanovEileen M Marrinan Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery: A conflict of capev- can exist even if no unethical or improper act results from it, and can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the person or profession.
Link to publication in Scopus. However, remote access to EBSCO’s databases from non-subscribing institutions is not allowed if the purpose of the use is auditlry-perceptual commercial gain through cost reduction or avoidance for a non-subscribing institution. Abstract Background and Aim: Listener experience and perception of voice quality. Auditory-perceptual assessment of voice a main auditoryy-perceptual in the diagnosis and therapy improvement of voice disorders.
Citations Publications citing this paper. Copyright and Conflict of Interest All submitted manuscripts should be accompanied with a statement from the author, showing there is no conflict of interest regarding that article. Shima Soleymani Previous Audiology.