CONSENSUS AUDITORY-PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF VOICE CAPE-V PDF

0 Comment

Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) The following parameters of voice quality will be rated upon completion of the following tasks. Request PDF on ResearchGate | On Jan 1, , M. Behlau and others published Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was developed to provide a protocol and form for clinicians to use when assessing the voice.

Author: Mezikus Vill
Country: Moldova, Republic of
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 5 May 2006
Pages: 390
PDF File Size: 19.24 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.21 Mb
ISBN: 878-7-88872-437-1
Downloads: 1845
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yozshukinos

Journal of Voice Available online 20 June A Training and Reliability Study. J Acoust Soc Am. Perceptual judgment of hypernasality and audible nasal emission in cleft palate speakers Kerri Downing The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality.

Measurement theory in action: Showing of 9 extracted citations. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. Kathy L ChapmanAdriane L.

Development of a standardized clinical protocol Gail B. Abstract Background and Aim: GerrattKristin Precoda Journal of speech and hearing research This study examined the reliability and the empirical validity of the CAPE-V when used by experienced voice clinicians judging normal and disordered voices.

Most Related  GASTROPARESIA PDF

Mahin Sedaie Editor in Chief: We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads. Keywords Consensus auditory-perceptual auditory-perceptaul of voice Voice Voice assessment.

Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol

EadieCarolyn R Baylor Journal of voice: Listener experience and perception of voice quality. From This Paper Figures, tables, and topics from this paper. Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice. Virginia WolfeDr.

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. All voice samples were heard using AKG K Europe headphones and were rated in two sessions with a 1-week interval: Intra-rater reliability coefficients ranged from 0. The voice and voice therapy. Copyright and Conflict of Interest All submitted manuscripts should be accompanied with a statement from the author, showing there is no conflict of interest regarding that article.

The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized evaluatuon quality.

Development of a standardized clinical protocol”. A conflict of interest can exist even if no unethical or improper act results from it, and can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in eavluation person or profession. Marc S de BodtFloris L.

Most Related  DIENTAMOEBA FRAGILIS PDF

Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer. Am J Speech Lang Pathol.

Development of a standardized clinical protocol ‘ American Journal of Speech-Language Pathologyvol. Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality.

Establishing Validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).

Eddins Journal of voice: Determination of fundamental frequency and voice intensity in Iranian Men and Women aged between 18 and 45 years. The CAPE-V protocol and recording form were designed to promote a standardized approach to evaluating and documenting auditory-perceptual judgments of vocal quality.

Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: