Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) The following parameters of voice quality will be rated upon completion of the following tasks. Request PDF on ResearchGate | On Jan 1, , M. Behlau and others published Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was developed to provide a protocol and form for clinicians to use when assessing the voice.
|Published (Last):||26 June 2011|
|PDF File Size:||13.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.16 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Kreiman J, Gerratt BR. Marc S de BodtFloris L. The CAPE-V protocol and recording form were designed to promote a standardized approach to evaluating and documenting auditory-perceptual judgments of vocal quality. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Peter MartinChristpher Palmer Journal of speech, language, and hearing research….
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. Perceptual and acoustic analysis of voice in individuals with total thyroidectomy: Vol 23 No 3 Content validity was assured by an EP linguistic expert.
Copyright and Conflict of Interest All submitted manuscripts should be accompanied with a statement from the author, showing there is no conflict of interest regarding that article. Journal of Voice Available online 20 June Topics Discussed in This Paper.
Get Access Get Access. The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia. From This Paper Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.
consenss The qualitative content validity was detected by collecting 10 questionnaires from 9 experienced speech and language pathologists and a linguist. Abstract Background and Aim: Study design This is a transversal, observational, descriptive, and comparative study. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. Perceptual judgment of hypernasality and audible nasal emission in cleft palate speakers Kerri Downing Link to citation list in Scopus. A summary of the consensus conference proceedings and the factors considered by the authors in developing this instrument are included.
Voice Disorders Search for additional papers on this topic. The qualitative content validity was proved for developed Persian version of the consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice. The act of submitting a manuscript to the journal carries with it the right to publish that paper and implies the transfer of the copyright from the author to the Publisher.
Santosh M, Rajashekhar B.
Intrarater reliability was obtained with Pearson correlation. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy.
Citations Publications citing this paper. Published by Elsevier Inc. Intra-rater reliability coefficients ranged from 0. Measurement theory in action: For reliability purposes, the voice samples of 40 dysphonic neurogenic, functional with and without laryngeal lesions adults years of age and 10 normal healthy speakers were recorded.
Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice.
Author links open overlay panel Sancha C. Second, we compared our raters’ judgments of overall severity to a priori consensus judgments of severity for the 59 voices. Virginia WolfeDr. Eddins Journal of voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol Gail B. The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
Statistical analysis for inter-rater reliability was obtained with the intraclass correlation coefficient. Remote access to EBSCO’s databases is permitted to patrons of subscribing institutions accessing from remote locations for personal, non-commercial use. A conflict of interest can exist even if no unethical or improper act results from it, and can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the person or profession.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology18 2 Development of a standardized clinical protocol”. Kathy L ChapmanAdriane L. J Acoust Soc Am.
The Americleft Speech Project: